16 Days: Family burnt to death in the DRC

During 16 Days of Activism for No Violence against Women and Children, the Legal Resources Centre will be sharing the stories of survivors of gender based violence who fled their countries to seek asylum in South Africa. Many women, children and sexual and gender non-conforming persons endure horrific hardship, sexual persecution, assault, rape and discrimination in their countries. When they arrive in South Africa their hardship does not end. Some women experience sexual persecution while crossing the border, while others may experience oppression, intolerance and discrimination while trying to create a life in South Africa. When they enter the asylum seeker process, they often endure further persecution. These are their stories.

Family burnt to death in the DRC

A was born in the Democratic Republic of Congo in a village in South Kivu. When she was 16 years old, soldiers came to her village and started to terrorise and kill people living in the village. Soldiers entered her home where they raped her in front of her parents. After she was raped, she was taken out of the house, leaving her parents inside. The soldiers then set fire to the house and both of her parents were burnt to death.

The reign of terror affected many households in the village and A escaped with some other children. As a group, they fled to Zimbabwe. A lived in a refugee camp in Zimbabwe for two months. At that time, cholera broke out in Zimbabwe and A fell very ill. She left the camp and travelled to South Africa where she has been living ever since. She met her husband when she arrived and they married a year later. She now has two children.

A applied for asylum in 2009. She received an asylum seeker permit, also known as a section 22 permit, which allows you to stay in the country legally until a decision is made about on your asylum seeker application. The permit will expire after 6 months but can be renewed. The process should not take longer than 6 months, but in the majority of cases, it takes far longer. A’s section 22 permit was renewed again and again until her second interview in March 2014. During her interview, the Refugee Status Determination Officer (RSDO) told her that, “foreigners just want to come to South Africa to steal the jobs and [she] should go back to [her] country.” Her asylum claim was rejected.

The Refugee Act 130 of 1998 of South Africa takes into account gender-related persecution in asylum claims. A has a well-founded fear of persecution and the RSDO failed to take the full circumstances of her home country into account, as mandated by the Refugees Act. The DRC has been labelled “the rape capital of the world” by the UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Margot Wallstrom, owing to rape statistics in the country. Women are targeted for rape, which is used as a “weapon of war”. Research shows that even today it is not safe for refugees to return to the DRC and women are unable to ask the government for protection.

The Legal Resources Centre assisted her to apply for a review of her application on this basis and recommends that asylum seekers approach civil society organisations, such as the Legal Resources Centre, to ask for legal assistance in instances when the RSDO fails to consider all of the grounds for asylum, which include race, tribe, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.


Published by


The Legal Resources Centre is a public interest law clinic established in South Africa in 1979

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s